Jay Shrivastava

I agree with the abovementioned statement to a great extent. Adulthood is more than academics, what they teach in school is primarily based on academics. A school should nurture the children’s probity, instill them with good morals. A nation is nothing without a great public, schools are primarily focused on producing unprecedented well behaved academically superior employees from their well-oiled machinery. Which innately results in lost generation who don’t know that academics isn’t the only yardstick to measure themselves. Every year we lose a great eccentric talent because he was judged based on academics. Rather than beating around the bush, I want to say that school system is outdated. Which is in serious need for reformation. Even in contemporary world a student opting for science is made ignorant of finances, taxes, etc . And in adulthood a that student had to go looking for help because his comprehension was made limited to science only. So, anything apart from the things he s

From the starting of time or from the starting of time for ourselves, we had this innate ability to make everything about ourselves. Any statement that questions the true nature and does not coincide with our belief system : that somehow we humans as a collective are special or deserves to be special ; has to be absurd. Everything around us is ours to exploit. Copernicus was the first person to formulate a model in which sun was the center of our universe rather than our Earth. He was condemned to death by priests but died due to natural causes. This is just a single incidence in our long standing history in which any viewpoint differing from the belief of mass was ostracized or condemned to death. But what is the reason for this pattern which has been repeated umpteenth times. The reason is simple, we are right and even if we were somehow wrong, we were just about right. Everything we do has got to be right or special. The world itself is nothing without us, if I wouldn't have exi

 A great novel as many people would agree, leaves the reader brokenhearted, crestfallen or bewildered. Writer of a novel is in many ways a poet of a long poem who fills the plot with delicate inticracies, highs and lows, without any expectation from readers as to where the plot would proceed. On the other hand, Adaptation of novel takes a great responsblity to remould the brainchild of an author to the liking of the viewers. Unsuprisingly, viewer and reader are two very different groups of people which are offered the same storyline. Groundbreaking bestseller book doesn't necessitates equally groundbreaking plot for the screen adaptation. Also, the cast are character of their own, so as to bring none of their self into the character is a big ask which without a shade of doubt many accomplished actors do all the time. But all these are small shortcomings in comparison to fulfill the expectation of everyone who have heard about the bestseller earlier. These people are prejudiced to e